Subject	16% lower numbers on a Dyno Dynamics vs DynoJet - I dynoed
Posted by	ELIM on January 19, 2011 at 10:00 PM
	This message has been viewed 314 times.
In Reply To	Dyno Dynamics and Mustang dynos are load bearing... posted by Only1Z on January 19, 2011 at 08:31 PM
Message	on the heartbreaker, Dyno Dynamics. The owner mentioned it would be approx 16% lower in HP and torque. I still want to dyno on a DynoJet and see for myself.
Follow Ups	Re: DYNO TESTING (cont.) - arrowenterprises 17:47:52 01/19/11 Mustang dynos tend to show lower output than dyno-jet - Mr.Stacy 18:04:23 01/19/11 "I have no idea what I'm talking about" = Y (n/m) - The Hawk 18:30:51 01/19/11 Re: "I have no idea" - arrowenterprises 19:38:10 01/19/11 You made the mistake of asking for input - BigTDogg (MA) 08:26:54 01/20/11 I'm not a dick! ...actually I'm more of a prick! =) (n/m) - The Hawk 12:00:02 01/20/11 I know, was really telling the newbie to get a thick skin :) (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 12:14:46 01/20/11 Searching would answer some of your q's and besides - The Hawk 11:59:06 01/20/11 Re: Dicks - arrowenterprises 19:47:13 01/20/11 Time to change ur manpon. - The Hawk 22:32:25 01/20/11 Now you're catching on :-) - BigTDogg (MA) 08:49:38 01/21/11 Re: Dicks - arrowenterprises 21:23:03 01/20/11 Here is your Pump SAE chart for a dynojet 554 VS 562 STD - Greg D. (Specialty-Z) 18:57:13 01/19/11 Re: Thanks for the effort... - arrowenterprises 19:55:30 01/19/11 Re: Re: Thanks for the effort... - Greg D. (Specialty-Z) 20:23:11 01/19/11 The effort... - arrowenterprises 20:45:59 01/19/11 Delta Sonic here in rochester has 100 at the pump - FuerGrissa 21:31:14 01/19/11 Re: Delta Sonic - arrowenterprises 21:38:25 01/19/11 Re: The effort... - Greg D. (Specialty-Z) 10:14:55 01/20/11 my stock turbos did 385 WHP on pump - dpjax 19:06:07 01/19/11 @ what boost and octane did you achieve that number? - Dave N 19:09:28 01/19/11 If memory serves me right it was 17.7psi on 93 octane (n/m) - John@Z1 08:50:57 01/20/11 it's a mustang dyno...it's different, aka the heart-break - fuzzymonkey 19:07:48 01/19/11 Andy, Google Mustang vs dynajet - FuerGrissa 19:52:42 01/19/11 Re: Will do. (n/m) - arrowenterprises 19:57:02 01/19/11 Re: Mustang vs dynajet - arrowenterprises 20:03:04 01/19/11 At the end of the day they are just numbers. - nissanguyz32 20:29:28 01/19/11 Re: Numbers. - arrowenterprises 20:48:23 01/19/11 First off you have a NICE car. I have the same turbos as you - nissanguyz32 21:29:23 01/19/11 Re: Numbers - arrowenterprises 21:46:59 01/19/11 Put your car on a dynojet then report back (n/m) - ztunerz 21:45:48 01/19/11 Dynos were developed for tuning purposes. - ZLover4Life 22:12:52 01/19/11 Re: Dynos for tuning purposes. - arrowenterprises 22:24:55 01/19/11 Even if they were the same dyno you wouldn't see the same #s - ZLover4Life 19:22:02 01/20/11 Dyno Dynamics and Mustang dynos are load bearing... - Only1Z 20:31:19 01/19/11 Dynojets can be load bearing like the one at SZ. (n/m) - nissanguyz32 20:39:33 01/19/11 That would be news to me. - Only1Z 22:11:14 01/19/11 just for your reference - nissanguyz32 22:32:34 01/19/11 16% lower numbers on a Dyno Dynamics vs DynoJet - I dynoed - ELIM 22:00:15 01/19/11 Save your money... - Only1Z 22:15:50 01/19/11 Sounds good. Will probably save it for the tune! (n/m) - ELIM 23:18:23 01/19/11
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.